Supplier invoice ingestion
Admin users can upload supported supplier invoices, review extracted lines and decide what should teach the commercial record.
Keystone already has a real evidence, Price Book and estimator foundation. The specialist workflow remains limited, so access is controlled while the product experience catches up with the underlying capability.

Actual sample workspace. Customer estimating access may vary while the workflow remains in early access.
Commercial evidence must stay traceable, extracted data must be checked and pricing suggestions must never become customer truth without a user decision.
Admin users can upload supported supplier invoices, review extracted lines and decide what should teach the commercial record.
Source-linked observations feed an explainable admin commercial view. Manual overrides remain visible and authoritative.
Reusable assembly knowledge exists, but the workflow remains specialist and is not presented as a polished mainstream experience.
The estimator read path can rank traceable suggestions without silently changing the quote. Wider customer availability is still controlled.
Every derived price should explain the invoices, expenses, quote outcomes or other supported records behind it.
A price the business has deliberately locked is not silently relearned.
Labour assumptions do not come from subcontractor execution alone.
Estimator output is read-only until an authorised user deliberately applies it through the existing quote workflow.
No. Supplier-invoice ingestion, reviewed price learning, the Price Book and estimate-assistance code exist, but the specialist estimator workflow remains limited. This public page keeps an early-access waitlist until the experience and deployment are ready for wider use.
The implemented commercial evidence layer can normalise supported supplier invoices, job expenses, quote outcomes, variations and reports. Supplier and manufacturer catalogue ingestion is not presented as a live source unless a real source path is configured.
No. Extracted invoice lines and commercial suggestions are reviewable inputs. Source evidence remains traceable, and manual price overrides remain authoritative.
No. Labour assumptions are only appropriate from manual assemblies, accepted templates, known subcontractor rates or explicit user input. Keystone does not infer labour productivity from subcontractor execution.
No. Estimating suggestions are a read path into the existing quote workflow. A user must review and explicitly apply commercial information; suggestions do not silently mutate a customer quotation.
Join the controlled rollout, or inspect the broader Keystone workspace first.
Explore the live workspace